2012

News Registration Abstract submission Deadlines Excursions Accommodation Organizing committee
First circular Second circular Abstracts Seminar History Program Travel Contact us
Новости
Первый циркуляр
Второй циркуляр
Регистрация
Оформление тезисов
Тезисы
Программа
Участники
Размещение
Экскурсии
Проезд
Важные даты
Оргкомитет
Обратная связь

Тезисы международной конференции

Рудный потенциал щелочного, кимберлитового

 и карбонатитового магматизма

Abstracts of International conference

Ore potential of alkaline, kimberlite

and carbonatite magmatism

Deep sources and isotope age of alkali-carbonatite and Pt-bearing ultramafic-mafic associations of the Urals

Rusin A.I.,* Krasnobaev A.A.,* Baneva N.N.,* Medvedeva E.V.,** Valizer P.M.**

* Institute of Geology and Geochemistry UB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia

** Ilmeny State Reserve UB RAS, Miass, Russia

rusin@igg.uran.ru

 

The concentric-zonal ultramafic-mafic massifs of foldbelts and alkali-carbonatite complexes of platforms are similar in structure expressed in dunite or olivinite core and rimming its wehrlite, clinopyroxenite and other zones distinct in the level of alkalinity and basicity of the rock associations (Efimov, 2010; Dubrovsky, 2011). The differences in chemical composition of the concentric-zonal massifs are considered to be related to the various geodynamic settings. The Ural Pt-bearing belt is an etalon of dunite-clinopyroxenite-gabbro massifs throughout the foldbelts. Its association with complexes of the Tagil paleoisland arc is considered to be the evidence of its formation at supra-subduction setting. The absolutely another geological-tectonic setting of alkali-carbonatite massifs and peculiarities of material composition indicate their relation to the riftogenic activization of stable areas of the continental crust.

For the long-term period, the Ilmeno-Vishnevogorsk alkali province was regarded as the genotype of alkali-carbonatite complexes of orogenic belts. The absence of relation to the deep mantle magmatism was considered as distinctive peculiarity of these complexes. We established that numerous mafic-ultramafic rocks of this province are characterized by anomalous high concentrations of rare and rare earth elements and include the fragments of alkali-ultramafic intrusion of the platform type disintegrated in the zone of the regional postcollision shift (Rusin et al., 2006). The ultramafic-mafic, alkali-ultramafic (metafoidolite), and miaskite-carbonatite typical rock associations may be distinguished in the structure of this intrusion. The geological interrelations of the first two associations observing in the separate blocks (Nyashevo and others) allow the supposition on the concentric-zonal structure of the intrusion. However, the results of the thorough study of metafoidolites are quite significant for understanding of its genesis (Rusin et al., 2012). The finding of the relict Cros+Px+Ky assemblage in these rocks indicates the grospidite level of origination of the primary melts. The Nd and Sr isotopic data of metafoidolites and related carbonatites testify to their generation from the EM1 and EM2 types. The U-Pb age of zircons is evidenced by the Riphean-Vendian (662 and 543 Ma) age of alkali-ultramafic association. The Lu-Hf system of zircons from miaskite-carbonatite association showed similarity of the primary Hf isotopic ratios in miaskites, nepheline pegmatites and carbonatites of the Vishnevogorsk massif (εHf = 3.5–5.7) corresponding to moderately depleted mantle (Nedosekova et al., 2010). The age of generation of the primary melts of alkali-carbonatite association is 790–880 Ma in accordance to the model Lu-Hf age of the early zircons. Together with age of zircons from metafoidolites, these data allow us to suggest that formation of alkali-ultramafic intrusion of the Ilmenogorsk zone occurred before the opening of the Ural paleoocean and was related to the Riphean-Vendian riftogenic activization caused by the deep-seated mantle plumes.

The material evidences of the Precambrian plume processes in the Urals are mostly expressed in the paleocontinental sector. There are dike swarms tracing along the entire Ural foldbelt, layered intrusions (Kusa-Kopan and Sarany belts), and manifestations of alkali-ultramafic magmatism (Suroyam massif, Chetlass carbonatite complex, etc.). At the same time, no significant eruptions of plateau basalts or their denudation products in the Riphean stratotypical sections are known in the Urals and this gives a ground to state that the products of deep partial melting accumulated in the basement of the Late Precambrian crust as a result of the dry plume underplating. This is confirmed by the transitional zone at the crust/mantle boundary registered by the URSEIS-95 seismic profile. The huge volumes of Late Precambrian gabbro in massifs of Pt-bearing belt, the universal development of high-temperature plastic (brittle-plastic) deformations in them related, as suggested, to the riftogenic lithospheric extension, and also petrochemical and metallogenic (Pt, Cr, and Ti-magnetite ores) similarity of the main rock associations with platform intrusions of the central type served as a base for the conclusions on the plume (underplating) nature of Pt-bearing belts (Rusin et al., 2009). The absence of harzburgites in the Pt-bearing belt (the obligatory element of the oceanic crust), isotopic-geochronological data, and similarity of REE distribution trends with rock associations accompanying the dunite core of the Kondyor massif (Efimov, 2010, Figs. 4 and 5) exclude the formation of the Pt-bearing belt massifs at supra-subduction setting.

The mineralogical-geochemical and isotopic-geochronological studies of zircons from all rock associations of the Pt-bearing belt allow us to establish the extreme duration of mantle zircon formation. Three age groups (2852–2656, 1608–564, and 495–463 Ma) were determined in zircons from dunites, clinopyroxenites, and gabbro. They are characterized by specific isotopic-geochemical peculiarities indicating the probable endogenic source (Anikina et al., 2012). The Archean and Early Proterozoic zircons are characterized by the wide variations in U (34–1891 ppm) and Th (5–560 ppm) contents and Th/U ratio (0.2–1.47) and high REE concentrations (377–1723 ppm). Their Hf isotopic composition indicates mostly juvenile origin from the sources significantly distinct in Lu/Hf ratio. The Late Proterozoic igneous zircons in anorthite gabbro have moderate U (68–306 ppm) and Th (46–638 ppm) contents and Th/U ratio (0.4–1.6) and relatively low REE contents (220–600 ppm). Their composition reflects the dry crystallization from the mafic melt and the primary Hf isotopic ratios are similar to the chondrite values (εHf = –3.6 to +3.0). The Late Proterozoic zircon from dunites is a result of transformation of older crystals from the depleted mantle (εHf = 14.6). Zircon is enriched in LREE that is similar to the Archean zircon from olivine-anorthite gabbro. The Early Paleozoic zircons from dunites (495–463 Ma), olivine-anorthite gabbro (450 Ma), and labradorite gabbro (428 Ma) are identical in morphology and composition. They have similar primary Hf isotopic ratio and εHf from +9 up to +15. This assumes the common source (TDMHf = 0.5–0.6 Ga) with higher Lu/Hf ratio in comparison with the source of ancient zircon. Probably, these zircons record the exhumation of the mantle block into the continental crust.

Presently, the conjugated study of U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopic systems of zircons is broadly used for the solution of problems of the origination and evolution of the deep mantle rocks. The finding of the Late Precambrian zircons with similar primary Hf isotopic ratio in alkali-ultramafic association of the Ilmenogorsk zone and concentric-zonal massifs of the Pt-bearing belt, together with petro- and geochemical characteristic of the rock associations, allows conclusion on formation of these complexes during the riftogenic stage of the development of the Urals foldbelt. The endogenic sources of these complexes could be a result of the influence of mantle plumes. The obviously expressed variations in Hf isotopic ratios in zircons different in age could be related not only to the change of endogenic sources but to the total effect of metasomatic, magmatic, and metamorphic processes in the mantle reservoirs. The principal possibility of the enrichment of zircons in radiogenic and non-radiogenic Hf limits the interpretation of the nature of endogenic source and requires the obligatory account of data on Sm-Nd ages of the rocks (Lokhov et al., 2009). First of all, this concerns the Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic ages of zircons reflecting the time of collision and postcollision events in the Urals. Their Hf isotopic ratios could be inherited and related to the early metamorphic evolution of the transformation of the primary substrate.

 

This study was supported by the Interdisciplinary project of the Urals Branch of RAS no. 12-С-5-1011 and the project no. 12-И 5-2035 jointly conducted with Siberian and Far East Branches of RAS.

 

References

 

Anikina, E.V., Krasnobaev, A.A., Rusin, A.I. et al. Isotopic-geochemical characteristics of zircons from dunite, pyroxenite, and gabbro of the Urals Pt-bearing belt // Dokl. Earth Sci. 2012. Vol. 443. Pt 1. P. 513-516.

Dubrovsky M.I. Systematics and petrogenesis of the rocks from concentric-zonal ultramafic massifs // Lithosphere. 2010. N 1. P. 34-45.

Efimov A.A. The results of the centenary study of the Ural Pt-bearing Belt // Lithosphere. 2010. N 5. P. 134-153.

Lokhov K.I., Kapitonov I.N., Bogomolov E.S. et al. Geochemistry of Hf isotopes from zircons and Nd isotopes from the rocks as a tool for correct interpretation of U-Pb geochronogical information and evaluation of the ore potential of mafic intrusions // In: Archean Granite-Greenstone Systems and Their Younger Analogues. Petrozavodsk. 2009. P. 109-114.

Nedosekova I.L., Belousova E.A., Sharygin V.V. Lu-Hf isotope composition of zircons from the Ilmeny-Vishnevogorsk complex (results of LA-ICP-MS study) // Yearbook-2009, IGG UBr RAS. Yekaterinburg, 2010. P. 283-288.

Rusin A.I., Valizer P.M., Krasnobaev A.A. et al. Origin of the garnet-anorthite-clinopyroxene-amphibole rocks from the Ilmenogorsk Complex (Southern Urals) // Lithosphere. 2011. N 1. P. 91-109.

Rusin A.I., Krasnobaev A.A., Rusin I.A. et al. Alkali-ultramafic association of the Ilmeny-Vishnevy Mountains // In: Geochemistry, Petrology, Mineralogy, and Genesis of Alkaline Rocks. Miass: UB RAS, 2006. P. 222-227.

Rusin A.I., Rusin I.A., Krasnobaev A.A. New interpretation of nature of the Ural Pt-bearing belt // In: Mafic-Ultramafic Complexes of Fold Regions and Related Deposits. Vol. 2. Yekaterinburg, 2009. P. 154-157.