2012

News Registration Abstract submission Deadlines Excursions Accommodation Organizing committee
First circular Second circular Abstracts Seminar History Program Travel Contact us
Новости
Первый циркуляр
Второй циркуляр
Регистрация
Оформление тезисов
Тезисы
Программа
Участники
Размещение
Экскурсии
Проезд
Важные даты
Оргкомитет
Обратная связь

Тезисы международной конференции

Рудный потенциал щелочного, кимберлитового

 и карбонатитового магматизма

Abstracts of International conference

Ore potential of alkaline, kimberlite

and carbonatite magmatism

Features of Exploration for Rare-Earth Orebody by Geophysical Methods in Proterozoic Syenite Massif of the Azov Ring Intrusion

 Nikolaev I.Yu., Fedotov S.M. 

 Ukrainian State Research and Design Institute of Mining Geology, Rock Mechanics and Mine Surveying (UkrNIMI) of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NANU), Donetsk, Ukraine EvgSheremet@yandex.ru

 

The Azov deposit of zirconium-rare-earth ores is located within similarly-named stock that is layered syenite intrusions amid rocks of the Volodarsky massif of the South Kalchik complex of Low Proterozoic within the Eastern Priazovie of Ukrainian Shield (US) Priazovsky megablock.

Plan view of the Azov structure is a zonal-ring ellipse of the area of 3.8 km2 of north-south strike. As its geology and structure are concerned, a deposit of the same name is located in the south and north parts of the Azov structure. Cross-section of syenites is intrusion body (stock) confined to intersection node of faults of north-south, north-west and east-west strike (Strekozov, 1998). Syenite stock is drilled over down to the depth of more than 350 m; according to geophysical data its depth can achieve several kilometers.

In 1988 ‑ 1992 within the boundaries of the Azov structure exploration for zirconium ores were conducted with large scope of drilling: 230 bore holes have been drilled along 21 profiles. It is determined that complex of taxites of south-east part of flat contact can be considered as productive zone with impregnated zircon-britholite-orthite orebody.

Methods of well gamma-ray logging and audiomagnetotelluric sounding (AMTS) were used in exploration for rare-earth orebody.

The Azov rare-earth deposit of US Priazovsky megablock is a perfect example of a deposit containing radioactive minerals. Well gamma-ray logging was conducted according to standard technique with the purpose of identification of different types of rock units, evaluation of gamma activity of rocks, testing anomalous zones for content of main radio nuclides, and also for detection of ore zones.

Qualitative well gamma-ray layering is quite accurate. Ore zones due to uranium and thorium isomorphically embedded in ore minerals (orthite, britholite, and others) have increased natural radioactivity (50‑500 µR/hour). Background values of natural gamma activity in enclosing rocks and barren interbedded layers are 10‑17 µR/hour (Sheremet, 2007).

Detailed geoelectrical survey along geological survey lines of the Azov deposit was conducted based on AMTS (Sheremet, 2007b).

Analysis of resistivity sections along the profiles of geological survey lines shows that geochemical anomalies coincide rather accurately with the zones of maximum low electrical resistance (10‑30 Ohm·m) everywhere where there are manifestations of sulphide impregnation. If there is no sulphide impregnation, these anomalies are not detected. That's exactly why anomalies can serve as additional exploration criterion for rare-earth orebody.

From the outcomes of geoelectric survey of the Azov structure we conclude that such areas can be near the main depth granosyenite intrusion (that breaks through gabbro-syenites of the Volodarsky massif) located to the west and also to the south of it at the outcrops of syenites.

Geoelectric survey of the Volodarsky massif and geological interpretation of the obtained data show that rocks have varied thickness (from several thousand meters to seven kilometers). Most of granosyenite and gabbro-syenite masses of the Azov structure propagate down to the depth not exceeding 1,500 m. They are branches of depth (down to 10,000 m) intrusion having endocontact facies. Regional geoelectric survey of the Azov and Volodarsky massifs reveal that formations of the Azov structure are not differentiates of the Volodarsky gabbro-syenite massif but branches of granite-granosyenite intrusion cutting the Volodarsky massif, which contains one more intrusion similar to that which branch is the Azov deposit.

 

References

Strekozov, S. N., Vasilchenko V. V., Gursky D. S. et al. Geologic structure and mineralization pattern of the Azov deposit // Mineral Resources of Ukraine. 1998. No. 3. P. 6-9.

Sheremet E. M., Strekozov S. N., Omelchenko A. A. Ecological problems in development of the Azov deposit of rare-metal‑rare-earth ores of increased radio activity of the Eastern Priazovie (Ukrainian Shield) // Ecological Problems. Donetsk: DonNTU. No. 1-2. 2007. P. 125-129.

Sheremet E. M., Strekozov S. N., Krivdik S. G. et al. Prediction of Orebodies of Rare Elements of Ukrainian Shield / under the editorship of S. G. Krivdik.  Donetsk, Veber. 2007b.  220 p.