Features of
kimberlitic magmatism in the North-East part of the Kirovograd
megablock of the Ukrainian Shield.
Kalashnyk G.A. *, Palkina E.
Yu. **
*-Geological
prospecting expedition 37 «Kirovgeology», Kiev, Ukraine,
kalashnik_anna1@mail.ru **-Crimean office of UkrGGRI, Simferopol,
Ukraine, e_leyka@mail.ru
Signs of kimberlitic magmatism by three epochs tektonical-magmatic
activation in the north-eastern part of Kirovograd megablock of the
UkrSh was discovered. The earliest era of kimberlitic magmatism by dykes
facies on the Lelekovsky fault was identified. They recorded in tectonic
sites established violations of the Northwest, latitudinal and
North-Eastern spread. Ages of kimberlitic dykes are 1815 and 1900 mln.
years. Kimberlitic dikes exposed in 14 wells (on Lelekovsky, Shorsovsky,
Ositnyaznsky sites). The bulk of the kimberlite rock of Lelekovsky fault
is talc-carbonate-
micaceous aggregated. Kimberlitic deeps xenolites by size of 2-8 mm to
several centimeters are mainly a mixture of plate-fibrous serpentine,
bastit, ore mineral. Xenolites underlying rocks according to
petrographical characteristics of correspond to garnet dunite and
garcburgite. On the composition of the xenolites and the cementing of
two intrusive phases of implementation. Kimberlite of explosive phase,
most productive on diamond, was not identify in bored wells. In the
examined mineralogical samples of kimberlite was discovered by a full
set of indicator minerals of kimberlite (IMK): pyropes, picroilmenites,
chromspinells, chromediopsides, highmagnezial olivine. However, the
chemical composition of the minerals-indicators, these kimberlite do not
qualify for inclusion in the diamond-bearing facies (377 chromspinells
from kimberlite of Lelekovsky site content Cr2O3
ranges from 10 to 47% (26 cases it exceeds 40%) and MgO contents vary
within 14-20%. In chromspinells from kimberlites of the Shorsovsky site
the maintenance of Cr2O3 makes 31–50 %, the
maintenance of MgO fluctuates within 10–17 %. In chromediopsides the
maintenance of Cr2O3 fluctuates from 0,98 to 1,29
%. The allocated grenades correspond a grossulyar-pyrope-almandine. It
allows to assume about eklogitic association. In test T-96-1 by weight
280 kg in the Crimean office of UKRGGRI two crystals of diamonds
octahedral gabituse in the size 0,19х0,18х0,14mm, 0,07х0,07х0,05mm were
are revealed. The thickness of kimberlitic dykes on the Shorsovsky site
changes from 0,5 to 18,2 m. Falling of bodies the vertical. Rock
containing kimberlites are granites. The average thickness of
kimberlitic dykes on the Lelekovsky site on all crossings (42 crossings)
makes 3,1 m and hesitates from 0,1 m to 7,8 m. Vertical scope of bodies
of kimberlites makes 91,6 m. Falling of bodies the subvertical.
A Devonian era of tectonic activization in the central part of UkrSh
treats a eruptive breccia on Rovenskaya structure formed owing to
eksplozive process. In explosive breccia the following IMK were found:
chromebearing low-ferruterous diopsides of lherzolite paragenesis by
graphite-pyrope facies of depth typical for lherzolitic nodules from
kimberlites, high-chromic spinells (Cr2O3=46,60-58,58%),
and also grain of high-chromic magnezial ilmenite (Cr2O3=3,27
%, MgO=3,03 %). Considering the low maintenance of IMK in technological
probe (probe 4-1 by weight 2060 kg) most likely that on the Rovno site
productive pipes of explosion where the magmatizm was shown mainly by
means of gas break with emission of a small amount of a kimberlitic
material were created.
The most productive concerning eksplozive activity in the central part
of UkrSh is low Paleocene stage of tektono-magmatic activization.
Manifestations are diverse. Products belong to eksplozive to a formation
of breccia and eksplozive-sedimentary educations which in the UkrSh
center in a Paleocene associate with Raygorodskaya stratum. The first
group of eksplozive structures is located in near contact parts of rocks
of Korsun-Novoukrainsky diphasic pluton. On many sites within
Raygorodskaya stratum direct signs of a kimberlitic magmatizm (sites by
Gruzka, Lesnoe, Ositnyazhsky) are revealed. Manifestations of avtolitic
breccia of kimberlite are referred to them, diamonds and IMK in the
rocks forming rings of emission eksplozive diatreme. As performance of
eksplozive structures is characterized by presence of mantle
derivatives, it testifies to powerful eksplozive activity of endogenic
character during eras of their formation. It is remarkable that at the
diamonds found around works including established in the tests which
have been selected from xenotufobreccia of eksplozive structures, the
defects connected with radiation exposure (the center of 575 nanometers
and others which consider typical for diamonds from spreading of
Ukraine), by results of spectral researches are absent. All established
defective centers are typical for the natural kimberlitic diamonds which
were not staying in spreading (Калашник
and others, 2010). The second group of the eksplozive structures
connected with a Paleocene era of tectonic activization is localized
within Subbotsky and Zelenogaysky sites and shown already on
considerable removal from a pluton in a northwest part Priingulsky
syncline. One of the main observable features of a chemical composition
of IMK of eksplozive structures of the Kirovograd megablock is
similarity to that of mantle nodules of dunite-gartsburgite structure of
diamondiferous kimberlites of Yakutia. It can testify to close physical
and chemical conditions of formation of those and other IMK (tab. 1,2).
Table 1. The Chemical compound chromshpinells from kimberlites and
eruptive breccia of the Kirovograd megablock and from kimberlites of
Yakutia (Афанасьев
and others, 2001)
Component |
Kirovograd megablock |
Yakutia |
Shorsovsky
site (kimberlite) |
Lelekovsky
site
(kimberlite) |
Gruzsky
site
(kimberlite) |
Zelenogayskaya
structure
(kimberlite) |
Rovensky
site
(eruptive
breccia) |
Pipes Aykhal, Udachnaya (gartsburgit- dunite) |
Pipe
Udachnaya
(lherzolite) |
Cr-
component |
35,3-41,1 |
17,4-39,3 |
35,3-84,0 |
76,4-83,9 |
65,0-78,1 |
83,4 |
41,0 |
Al-
component |
52,9-63,2 |
81,2-61,8 |
14,1-45,6 |
11,9-20,2 |
7,2-13,3 |
12,4 |
42,1 |
Ulvoshpinell |
0,1-0,6 |
0,2-0,5 |
0,5-5,2 |
0,1-0,6 |
1,3-1,8 |
0,4 |
2,8 |
f
, % |
29,2-41,9 |
28,0-23,5 |
58,9-64,3 |
40,9-51,9 |
46,8-73,0 |
45,1 |
41,0 |
Ко |
43,8-75,7 |
9,4-20,7 |
3,4-50,5 |
27,3-28,6 |
38,2-45,0 |
11,3 |
0 |
Table 2 the Chemical composition of garnets from kimberlites of the
Kirovograd megablock and Yakutia (Афанасьев
and others, 2001)
Components |
Kirovograd megablock |
Yakutia |
Shorsovsky
site |
Gruzsky
site |
Pipes Aykhal, Udachnaya (gartsburgit-dunite) |
Pipe
Udachnaya
(lherzolite) |
Са-
component |
12,9 - 17,5 |
10,9 - 11,4 |
1,8 – 11,2 |
13,3 – 16,5 |
Mg-
component |
28,3 - 66,6 |
71,3 – 73,7 |
76,0 – 87,7 |
61,6 – 75,2 |
Cr-
component |
0,1 - 0,6 |
18,5 – 20,9 |
11,2 – 40,2 |
4,5 – 16,7 |
f
, % |
36,3 - 76,8 |
17,9 – 18,4 |
11,7 – 16,2 |
14,1 – 27,8 |
In the course of carrying out diamond-searching works we established a
spatial and temporary associativity of kimberlitic dykes (ages are 1815
and 1900 million years) and hydrothermal fields of uranium (age of the
main uranium ore of an albititic formation is 1850-1700 million years)
in the Kirovograd uranium-ore area in the Subbotsko-Moshorinsky
mineragenetic zone of mantle penetration. The analysis of noted
associativity on UkrSh allowed to draw a conclusion that hydrothermal
fields of uranium are dated for feeding fluid systems of zones of the
deep faults, carrying out the CO2 solutions enriched with
mantle uranium. Such zones are diagnosed by manifestations of
kimberlitic, the ultrabasic alkaline rocks, the phenomena of carbonate
formation of rocks of various structure. The spatial proximity of
manifestations of the ultrabasic alkaline magmatizm and uranium ore
facilities means an important role of deep factors in formation of a
rich uranium ore formation. Thus the faults marked by kimberlitic
objects, serve as effective conductors of specialized uranium-bearing
fluids of a mantle origin to what high concentration of uranium in
kimberlites of the Kirovograd uranium ore area (18-20 g/t (Цымбал
and others, 2003), in particular, testifies. The
kimberlites considerably enriched with uranium, from our point of view,
are petrological-geochemical indicators of existential activization of
sites of mantle enriched with uranium – potential sources of
U-ore-forming fluid streams. In such conditions spatial communication of
hydrothermal fields of uranium and kimberlitic dykes is caused by a
uniform structural and tectonic factor of a ore formations – an
arrangement over active mantle structures, a community of a mantle
source of uranium and the carbonic acid, generating kimberlitic magmas
on upper mantle depths and the deep fluids which were an integral part
which are carrying out its transportation on the top structural floors.
As it is represented, the established feature can be considered in
addition in a complex of criteria of detection of hydrothermal fields of
uranium in other a little studied potentially uranium-ore areas, areas,
junctions and zones. It can promote increase of efficiency and focus of
look-ahead and search and search works on uranium. It can promote
increase of efficiency and focus of look-ahead and search and search
works on uranium. Besides carried out in a northeast part of the
Kirovograd megablock of research and the revealed manifestation of a
kimberlitic magmatizm, a find of radical diamonds and the highpressure
IMK similar on structure to diamondiferous kimberlites of Yakutia
testify to prospects of the region on detection of diamondiferous rocks
of kimberlite structure and need of continuation of researches of this
direction.
Literature:
Афанасьев В.П.,
Зинчук Н.Н., Похиленко Н.П. Морфология и морфогенез индикаторных
минералов кимберлитов. Новосибирск. 2001. 275 с.
Калашник А.А., Палкина Е.Ю., Макивчук
О.Ф., Кирьянов Н.Н., Хренов А.Я.
Результаты
поисковых работ по выявлению алмазоносных объектов в северо-восточной
части Кировоградского блока УЩ// Зб. наукових праць УкрДГРІ.
2010. № 3-4. С. 44-60.
Цымбал С.Н., Кривдик С.Г. Особенности вещественного состава кимберлитов
Украины // Матер. наук.-техн. наради «Стан, перспективи та напрямки
геологорозвідувальних
робіт на алмази в України».
К.: УкрДГРІ, 2003. С.22-31. |