2012

News Registration Abstract submission Deadlines Excursions Accommodation Organizing committee
First circular Second circular Abstracts Seminar History Program Travel Contact us
Новости
Первый циркуляр
Второй циркуляр
Регистрация
Оформление тезисов
Тезисы
Программа
Участники
Размещение
Экскурсии
Проезд
Важные даты
Оргкомитет
Обратная связь

Тезисы международной конференции

Рудный потенциал щелочного, кимберлитового

 и карбонатитового магматизма

Abstracts of International conference

Ore potential of alkaline, kimberlite

and carbonatite magmatism

 

U-Pb SHRIMP Geochronology and Geochemical Peculiarities of Zircons from Igneous Rocks of Lomonosov Submarine Massif: an Evidence for Proterozoic Basement Presence in the Northern Margin of the Black Sea Depression?

Shniukova K.

Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation NAS of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine

shniukova@igmof.gov.ua

Lomonosov submarine massif (LSM) located in the Black Sea 24 miles to the south-west from Sevastopol is studying since its discovery in 1989. LSM is composed of volcanic and plutonic rocks which outcrops extend for 40 km along the continental slope at the depth of 500-1800 m. As a result of study LSM has been considered to be a fragment of paleoisland arc stretching from south-west to north-east, that is subparallel to the Mountainous Crimea (Shnyukov et al, 1997). Three island-arc series have been divided among the LSM volcanic rocks, namely high-magnesian (HM), moderate-magnesian (MM) and shoshonite. First two series are spread out in the central and eastern parts of LSM and represented by full number of normal series rocks: basalt – andesibasalt – andesite – dacite – plagiorhyodacite – plagiorhyolite. The third subalkaline series occupies the western part of LSM and is out of this review. Plutonic rocks embrace full number of rocks, too: gabbro – diorite – quartz diorite – tonalite – plagiogranite (trondhjemite) and are comagmatic to the MM volcanic series.

HM and MM volcanites are petrographically identical; they have both porphyric and aphyric varieties. Basic and partly intermediate rocks are spilitized. Phenocrysts are represented by plagioclase, augite (endiopside), rarely orthopyroxene. An absence of olivine and magnetite and the presence of quartz in the groundmass of even basics are characteristic. Intermediate and acidic plutonic rocks have the hypabyssal signs and contain hornblende and high-An plagioclase. Petrochemically both normal volcanic series and plutonites are calc-alkaline; tholeiites are almost absent. All acidic rocks follow trondhjemitic trend. HM and MM series are clearly separated in all petrochemical and geochemichal diagrams; their common features are low TiO2, high FeO*, low K2O contents. HM series whose basic members contain up to 19% MgO while acidic ones up to 4% has been identified with low-Ca boninite series (CaO/Al2O3<0,75), although TiO2 content in it corresponds rather to komatiites than boninites (<0,8%) and there are many basic rocks with too low SiO2 content (<53%). Their REE patterns being slightly LREE-enriched unlike more flat MM basics ones aren’t typically boninitic U-shaped and are characterized by negative Eu anomaly due to plagioclase fractionation.

Both volcanic and plutonic rocks of the LSM were dated by K-Ar method in the nineties (37 determinations) (Shnyukov et al, 1997; Shcherbakov, Shnyukova, 2000). Datings refer mainly to Cretaceous and Palaeogene (from 147 to 41 Ma, isolated datings 170 and 26-31 Ma). On their basis two stages of magmatic activity in LSM were established , namely Early Cretaceous (with maximum of about 125 Ma) and Late Cretaceous – Early Paleogene (with maximum of about 65 Ma). A petrochemical zonality together with rejuvenation was outlined in LSM approximately across arc’s strike from south-east towards north-west that is from supposed arc front (boninites) to its back (shoshonites).

In order to obtain more reliable age determination of the LSM magmatism, zircons have been picked out in the various normal series rocks from the central part of LSM. Zircons are rare in the MM series rocks being singular in the HM series ones. U-Pb zircon dating has been performed under the direction of S.Sergeev using secondary ion microprobe SIMS SHRIMP-II at CIR FGUP “VSEGEI” in 6 samples: one from HM andesibasalt (5 grains, 15 spots); one from tonalite (3 grains, 6 spots); one from MM andesite (10 grains, 10 spots); one from MM plagiorhyodacite (1 grain, 5 spots); two samples from MM plagiorhyolite (15 grains, 15 spots; 1 grain, 3 spots). All dated zircons are igneous and homogeneous, practically all age values are concordant, but the values themselves appeared to be unexpected.

The most young dating (Bajocian) has been obtained for the zircon from MM andesite (168,5±1,7 Ma) that was dredged at the same station within LSM where similar andesite yielded the most ancient K-Ar age among effusives, exactly 147 Ma. K-Ar datings of sedimentary rocks (argillites) from another close-located station gave age determinations in the range of 155-166 Ma while the diorite from the same station yielded single estimation of 170 Ma. So, in the central part of LSM Jurassic block is surely present, which was confirmed by U-Pb zircon dating.

However, the Cretaceous-Paleogene age of the main stages of LSM magmatism was not confirmed. Moreover, both volcanic LSM series appeared to be not continuously differentiated but consisting of multiple-aged products. Zircons from the most acidic rocks of MM series (plagiorhyolites) yielded the most ancient Paleoproterozoic mean ages, exactly 2030±12 and 2022±10 Ma. These zircons haven’t any geochemical peculiarities and correspond to ones from appropriate rocks, like zircon from Bajocian andesite. Whereas a little younger zircon (Late Paleoproterozoic) from three more basic rocks displays very specific composition. Mean ages are the next: for MM plagiorhyodacite 1761±44, for tonalite 1759±25, for HM andesibasalt 1794±42 Ma. These zircons are notable for low U concentrations (average 7,6; 25,2; 4,4 ppm, respectively) by usual Th concentrations resulting in extremely high Th/U ratios (in first two cases average 16; in the last 111, range from 10 to 262!). At that these zircons contain high percentage of non-radiogenic Pb by common not high Pb content. It should be noted that one zircon grain from tonalite with ordinary Th/U ratio gave age of 636±20 Ma.

Zircons with such unusual Th/U ratios are few and occur only in some alkaline rocks, such as syenite and nepheline syenite pegmatites (Belousova et al, 2002). Zircons there may contain numerous inclusions like LSM ones. It is difficult to explain an occurrence of such zircons in the island-arc rocks and all the more in boninites. Certainly, it might be supposed that Proterozoic zircons are xenogenic; their source is a metamorphic basement where they occured in turn due to Gondwanian provenance. Such explanation of Proterozoic detrital zircons is given for the neighbouring Black Sea structures of Greater Caucasus and North Dobrogea (Balica et al, 2011; Somin, 2009). But zircon from LSM first, has fresh unrounded magmatic habit and second, differs from metamorphic rocks zircons by geochemical peculiarities. It seems too daring to concede that zircon age is contemporaneous with true age of LSM rocks; on the other hand, all zircon sampling points are indeed located within the Pre-Cretaceous area according to the LSM map built on the basis of new seismic profile interpretation. Possibly, K-Ar datings reflect the rejuvenation of K-Ar system caused by secondary processes during the Cretaceous-Paleogene.

No doubt that the crystalline basement of the northern periphery of the Black Sea depression encloses or enclosed Pre-Riphean blocks, one of which may have situated in the LSM base. The only structure of the Black Sea depression known to have Precambrian basement is the Andrusov Ridge served as a provenance for Upper Jurassic conglomerates of the Mountainous Crimea. These conglomerates often contain the pebbles of microcline granites whose sourceland was considered by many researchers to locate to the south of present-day Crimea and whose K-Ar dating yielded ages in the range of 850-1500 Ma (Boyko et al, 1989). Remarkable that these granites are more or less affected by dynamic metamorphism that in fact was dated for microcline. Initial “magmatic” age for zircons from these granites was estimated by total lead method as no less than 1000-1500 Ma (isolated datings up to 2100 Ma) (Andreev et al, 1993). Apropos, magmatic zircons from these granites display rather high usual U content. It is this stage of magmatism that zircons from most acidic LSM rocks probably refer to. In the issue, a Mid-Black Sea High with granitized Proterozoic basement whose existance was persisting by many native geologists and geophysicists since the seventies (The Earth’s Crust..., 1975) might occupy not only base of Andrusov and Shatsky Ridges as it is considered now but go on further to the west-north-west till LSM; alkaline rocks are assumed to be its component here.

The data obtained give rise to doubt about an island-arc origin of some calc-alkaline LSM rocks, espesially of HM series suspected to be boninitic. With Proterozoic datings beeing taken as a truth all the ancient history of the Black Sea depression needs a revision, so far as generation mechanisms for high-Mg melts in the Phanerozoic and Paleoproterozoic are distinctive in kind. In the Phanerozoic their petrogenesis is related to the subduction processes in the active continental margins and island arcs, while in the Paleoproterozoic their production might be caused by assimilation of low-crustal material by mantle plume melts within intraplate environment, as it was shown for high-magnesian volcanites of Vetreny Belt in Karelia (Sharkov et al, 1997). To clear up the situation in the near future more isotope analysis should be done.

SHRIMP analyses were partly financially supported by OC”Rosneft”.

References

Андреев А.В., Шнюкова Е.Е., Шнюков С.Е., Чебуркин А.К., Белоусова Е.А., Савенок С.П. Геохимические особенности и возраст гетерогенных популяций акцессорного циркона из гранитов гальки юрских конгломератов Горного Крыма // Геол. журн. (Украина). 1993. №6. С.128-135.

Бойко А.К., Вишняк М.М., Мельникова Л.В., Шнюкова Е.Е. Выявление участия добайкальских образований в «гранитном» основании северной периферии Черноморской впадины (по данным калий-аргонового датирования гранитоидных галек Горного Крыма) // Геол. журн. 1989. №1. С.55-65.

Земная кора и история развития Черноморской впадины / Под ред. Ю.Д.Буланже, М.В.Муратова, С.И.Субботина, Б.К.Балавадзе. М.: Наука. 1975. 358 с.

Шарков Е.В., Смолькин В.Ф., Красивская И.С. Раннепротерозойская магматическая провинция высокомагнезиальных бонинитоподобных пород в восточной части Балтийского щита // Петрология. 1997. Т.5. № 5. С. 503-522.

Шнюков Е.Ф., Щербаков И.Б., Шнюкова Е.Е. Палеоостровная дуга севера Черного моря. К.: Чорнобильінтерінформ. 1997. 287 с.

Balica C., Balintoni I., Seghedi A. Megina Metamorphic Sequence, a New Gondwanan, Peri-Amazonian Terrane in North Dobrogea, Romania // Abstracts of the 3rd International Symposium on the Geology of the Black Sea Region, Bucharest, Romania, 1-10 October, 2011. Supplement to GEO-ECO-MARINA N 17/2011. P. 25.

Belousova E., Griffin W., O'Reilly Suzanne Y., Fisher N. Igneous zircon: trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2002. V 143. N 5. P 602-622.

Shcherbakov I.B., Shnyukova K.E. Magmatism and Geodynamics of the Lomonosov Submarine Massif (the Black Sea) // Геол. журн. (Украина). 2000. №2. С.59-67.

Somin M.L. Geology of Crystalline Basement of the Greater Caucasus: New Data // Abstracts of the 2nd International Symposium on the Geology of the Black Sea Region, Ankara, Turkey, 5-9 October, 2009. P.186-187.