2012

News Registration Abstract submission Deadlines Excursions Accommodation Organizing committee
First circular Second circular Abstracts Seminar History Program Travel Contact us
Новости
Первый циркуляр
Второй циркуляр
Регистрация
Оформление тезисов
Тезисы
Программа
Участники
Размещение
Экскурсии
Проезд
Важные даты
Оргкомитет
Обратная связь

Тезисы международной конференции

Рудный потенциал щелочного, кимберлитового

 и карбонатитового магматизма

Abstracts of International conference

Ore potential of alkaline, kimberlite

and carbonatite magmatism

Hydrothermal mineralization features of alkali magmatic rocks of North-Pripyat magmatism area

N.D. Mikhailov, A.G. Laptsevich

Republican unitary enterprise “Belarusian Research & Development geological prospecting institute”, Minsk, Republic of Belarus

mihailov@geology.org.by

 

Magmatic rocks of North-Pripyat area resume in the north-eastern direction the territorially uniform Pripyat area of rift magmatism extending beyond the bounds of Pripyat graben.

Within the territory of this area 2 types of hydrothermal (catagenetic) mineralization are identified. The former type as to the composition of mineral association(with certain exceptions) and isotopic-geochemical properties of minerals is congruent with the hydrothermal association of the eastern zone of Pripyat graben. The composition of hydrothermal mineral associations includes quartz, calcite, dolomite, barite, celestine, hematite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite, antimonite. A certain composition variation of the association is observed within the bounds of North-Pripyat area depending on the location.

The latter type of mineralization is to some extent similar in its manifestation to halocatagenetic rock mineralization peculiar within the bounds of Pripyat trough which is evidenced in the rocks occurring lower than evaporate sediments. The distinction lies in the composition of host rocks – magmatic ones (North-Pripyat area) which provide the mineralization of the given type with intriguing character.Also the distinction consists in the mineral association detected in the borehole cores of the localities prospected for diamonds which is registered in considerable shows of quartz, hematite, sulfides and occasionally fluorite. Most probably in terms of depositional environment the given mineralization has a polygenetic character where both halocatagenetic and hydrothermal processes were in action. Its specific feature is a sharp prevalence of gypsum in the composition of rock associations and predominantly fractural type of localization in the form of vertical, subvertical and lenticular stringers and pockets. All this is indicative of postmagmatic activity of fault tectonics in North-Pripyat zone, which lasted at least up to the Post-Frasnian time. Postmagmatic activity apparently displayed itself not only in the rock fracturing but also in hydrodynamic and palaeotemperatural aspects which is confirmed by both the composition of mineralization and by the geochemical dataof minerals.

The study of mineralogical and geochemical specific features of sulfate-type mineralization of North-Pripyat area makes it possible to assume at least 2 mechanisms of its formation: a) through the dissolution of sulfate member of Narovsky horizon (D2nr) with hydrothermal solutions and further sulfate crystallization in the form secondary minerals in the overlying igneous rocks; b) the formation of secondary sulfate-containing associations during halocatagenesis owing to palaeobrines of evlanov-livensky evaporate sediments. A similar type of gypseous secondary mineralization is observed in volcanogenic-sedimentary rocks in Arkhangelsk diamondiferous province (Bogatikov and others, 1999). But in this casethe Permian saliferous sediments frequently overlapping the Devonian volcanogenic-sedimentary formations might have servedas a meditated sulfate source served.

The paper is executed with financial support from the Belarusian Republican Fund of fundamental Research-Russian Fund of Fundamental Research Х12Р – 058.

 

References:

1. Mikhailov N.D. and others, Stratigraphic significance of gypsum manifestations in volcanogenic rocks of North-Pripyat area. // Stratigraphy and palaeontology of geological formations of Belarus. – Minsk, 2003 – P. 197-201

2. Bogatikov O.A. and others. Arkhangelsk diamondiferous province.Moscow – 1999 – P. 524.